We do not handle social security disability claims
Recent Post

Social Security Disability Offsets in Disability Insurance Claims

Justin Frankel
November 6, 2013 | Disability Insurance Claims
Over $250 Million Recovered for Our Clients

Clients often ask why Long Term Disability Insurance companies are allowed to deduct their Social Security benefits from disability checks.

The history is complicated, but the answer is simple: most disability policies that are purchased through the workplace include a clause that the LTD benefits will be reduced by the amount of money paid by Social Security. This language can be found in a section of the policy often titled “Offsets” or “Other Income Benefits.” Social Security Disability is the primary offset, although there may be others; it all depends on the language contained with each policy.

If a disabled individual’s children receive Social Security, those funds will be considered for an offset as well, as they are counted as the household’s Social Security benefit.

The Law Office of Justin Frankel does not handle Social Security Disability claims.

We do however represent clients who are receiving benefits under their ERISA policies who have applied for Social Security benefits. We educate our clients to be sure that they understand that if they receive Social Security benefits after they have been receiving benefits from their workplace disability policies, they will have to reimburse the insurance company for the offset – – as soon as they receive their back pay of Social Security benefits.

This is a huge problem and a shock to those who have not received the correct guidance.

Most LTD insurance companies require claimants to sign a Social Security Reimbursement Agreement before benefits are paid by the LTD company. Individuals who do not make this re-payment of the Social Security award to their LTD carrier may find their monthly checks reduced or even halted until the repayment has been made. In our experience, the disability insurance company does attempt to inform the claimants that they must reimburse the insurance company for the amount of the “overpayment” but when you are too ill to work, often this is the kind of bureaucratic headache that can easily spiral from a simple oversight into a massive financial problem.

There are been cases where courts have said that the offsets are not acceptable, but these are primarily in cases where the policy language is not specific enough or does not appear in the contract. In general, almost all disability insurance policies purchased by employees through the workplace contains this offset section.

In theory, the offset provision was designed to ensure that the combined benefits paid to a disabled employee are not more than the person would receive if they were working. From a social policy perspective, the intent was to prevent the possibility of a nation of employees who earned more for not working than for being productive members of society.

Disability insurance was not available to most employees until 1956, when Congress extended Social Security benefits to include disability coverage so as to reduce the cost to employers for providing disability insurance to workers. At that time, only upper management and senior officials of companies had disability insurance. Today disability insurance is offered to and purchased by millions of Americans and is considered a part of any benefits package for salaried employees.

It should be noted that most individually or privately purchased disability insurance policies do not have offset clauses. Individuals with high incomes often find a mixture of workplace disability policies and privately purchased disability insurance policies provide the correct level of coverage for them and their families.

If you have questions about this or any disability insurance matter, call our office at 1-888-583-4959 to learn how we can help.

Justin C Frankel

Written By Justin Frankel


Justin C. Frankel is committed to fighting for the rights of clients when their long term disability insurance claims have been denied, delayed or terminated.

Client Testimonials

Rating stars 5.0 Average on Martindale & AVVO
  • We know how important our work is to the people we represent, and we’re pleased to share this recent note from a client. Dear Justin and Christina, I wanted to take a moment to express my sincere g…
  • Our 60-year-old client worked for the world’s largest out-of-home advertising company as a Senior Buyer and outdoor furniture supplier, doing everything necessary to manage a contract for twenty ye…
  • Successful ERISA Appeal of Cigna Denial for High-Ranking Aviation Executive from Florida A 61-year old woman with a prestigious role at a leading aviation company never imagined she would stop work…
  • ERISA Case Headed to Trial in Federal Court – Barber v. Sun Life & Health A Federal Judge in Connecticut has scheduled a trial with live witnesses in an ERISA case, to be decided under the arbi…
  • F&N Resolves a Four Year Delay in UNUM Lump Sum Settlement Matter We were contacted by a 56 year-old man from Maryland who had been trying to negotiate a lump sum settlement of his private disa…
  • Our client, a successful New York dentist, was on claim for a number of years with Trustmark Insurance, due to severe orthopedic issues, which did not permit him to safely and effectively practice …
  • “OK, now that I have had a chance to calmly review the documents, I just wanted to thank you for all of your help. I am certain that if I would have tried to do this myself, I would not have had th…
  • The Law Office of Justin Frankel Navigates Complex Issues, From Claim Preparation to Lifetime Management, for Chiropractor A New York chiropractor in his mid-50s was concerned about complex issues …