We do not handle social security disability claims
Recent Post

Court Rules Against New York Life on Dependent Offset Efforts

WRITTEN BY:
Justin Frankel
September 30, 2013 | Disability Insurance Claims
Over $250 Million Recovered for Our Clients

A New York Federal Court has ruled against New York Life and in favor of a long term disability insurance claimant, on an important issue for many claimants. This is whether New York Life is permitted to offset for benefits paid to a dependent, such as a child. At issue in this case was whether New York Life was permitted to offset benefits and potentially recover an overpayment of benefits paid to the claimant, for benefits received from Social Security and paid on behalf of the claimant’s minor child.

The benefits at issue were paid to the ex-wife of the claimant on behalf of his daughter. The claimant argued that the offset and overpayment recovery efforts were impermissible, as the child was not his dependent and did not live with him. New York Life argued that it was permitted to offset the benefits and recover an overpayment on the basis of policy language as well as a repayment agreement which the long term disability insurance claimant had executed.

The Court rejected New York Life’s arguments — holding that the plain language in the policy did not support New York Life’s ability to pursue recovery of the dependent Social Security benefits. Because the Court found the plan language to explicitly support the claimant’s position, judgment was granted to the claimant and against New York Life. Lastly, the Court determined that the claimant could pursue damages and attorneys fees.

The issue of an insurer’s efforts to secure recovery of benefits resulting from an award of Social Security Disability benefits is very common. If you are facing that issue, we can help you.

Brutvan v. New York Life

Justin C Frankel

Written By Justin Frankel

Attorney

Justin C. Frankel is committed to fighting for the rights of clients when their long term disability insurance claims have been denied, delayed or terminated.


Client Testimonials

Rating stars 5.0 Average on Martindale & AVVO
  • We know how important our work is to the people we represent, and we’re pleased to share this recent note from a client. Dear Justin and Christina, I wanted to take a moment to express my sincere g…
  • Our 60-year-old client worked for the world’s largest out-of-home advertising company as a Senior Buyer and outdoor furniture supplier, doing everything necessary to manage a contract for twenty ye…
  • Successful ERISA Appeal of Cigna Denial for High-Ranking Aviation Executive from Florida A 61-year old woman with a prestigious role at a leading aviation company never imagined she would stop work…
  • ERISA Case Headed to Trial in Federal Court – Barber v. Sun Life & Health A Federal Judge in Connecticut has scheduled a trial with live witnesses in an ERISA case, to be decided under the arbi…
  • F&N Resolves a Four Year Delay in UNUM Lump Sum Settlement Matter We were contacted by a 56 year-old man from Maryland who had been trying to negotiate a lump sum settlement of his private disa…
  • Our client, a successful New York dentist, was on claim for a number of years with Trustmark Insurance, due to severe orthopedic issues, which did not permit him to safely and effectively practice …
  • “OK, now that I have had a chance to calmly review the documents, I just wanted to thank you for all of your help. I am certain that if I would have tried to do this myself, I would not have had th…
  • The Law Office of Justin Frankel Navigates Complex Issues, From Claim Preparation to Lifetime Management, for Chiropractor A New York chiropractor in his mid-50s was concerned about complex issues …