We do not handle social security disability claims
Recent Post

Court Finds In Favor Of Claimant With Vestibular Disorder/Vertigo

WRITTEN BY:
Justin Frankel
August 4, 2015 | Case Results
Over $250 Million Recovered for Our Clients

A Federal Judge has determined that a claimant is entitled to her benefits from Liberty Mutual, after her claim had been terminated and her appeal denied.

The Court, weighing the evidence on a de novo review, determined that the claimant’s medical support was of more quality than the evidence developed by Liberty Life, which included surveillance obtained over eight (8) days, a peer review by a hired doctor, and an examination performed by a doctor hired by Liberty Mutual.

The claimant, who left work several months after suffering from vertigo and dizziness, when her symptoms significantly worsened, worked in a sedentary desk job that required near constant use of a computer. While on claim, Liberty Mutual obtained surveillance of her – a common tactic by Liberty Mutual – which showed her driving short distances, carrying groceries and running errands. The Court, however, was not persuaded by the surveillance, noting that these activities were not inconsistent with what the claimant had reported in her Activities Questionnaire to Liberty Mutual.

Liberty Mutual argued that the conditions allegedly impairing the claimant were “purely subjective” and thus, could not support the continuation of benefits. The Court was not persuaded by this argument, and ultimately determined that the claimant should be afforded her own occupation benefits. The Court did, however, remand the claim back to Liberty Mutual to consider her eligibility for continued benefits under the any occupation standard in the policy.

The Court thus granted her benefits, with interest on the unpaid benefits for the own occupation period, and permitted the claimant to pursue her attorney’s fees.

Anderson v. Liberty Mutual

Justin C Frankel

Written By Justin Frankel

Attorney

Justin C. Frankel is committed to fighting for the rights of clients when their long term disability insurance claims have been denied, delayed or terminated.


Client Testimonials

Rating stars 5.0 Average on Martindale & AVVO
  • We know how important our work is to the people we represent, and we’re pleased to share this recent note from a client. Dear Justin and Christina, I wanted to take a moment to express my sincere g…
  • Our 60-year-old client worked for the world’s largest out-of-home advertising company as a Senior Buyer and outdoor furniture supplier, doing everything necessary to manage a contract for twenty ye…
  • Successful ERISA Appeal of Cigna Denial for High-Ranking Aviation Executive from Florida A 61-year old woman with a prestigious role at a leading aviation company never imagined she would stop work…
  • ERISA Case Headed to Trial in Federal Court – Barber v. Sun Life & Health A Federal Judge in Connecticut has scheduled a trial with live witnesses in an ERISA case, to be decided under the arbi…
  • F&N Resolves a Four Year Delay in UNUM Lump Sum Settlement Matter We were contacted by a 56 year-old man from Maryland who had been trying to negotiate a lump sum settlement of his private disa…
  • Our client, a successful New York dentist, was on claim for a number of years with Trustmark Insurance, due to severe orthopedic issues, which did not permit him to safely and effectively practice …
  • “OK, now that I have had a chance to calmly review the documents, I just wanted to thank you for all of your help. I am certain that if I would have tried to do this myself, I would not have had th…
  • The Law Office of Justin Frankel Navigates Complex Issues, From Claim Preparation to Lifetime Management, for Chiropractor A New York chiropractor in his mid-50s was concerned about complex issues …